Comments on: Dodge Challenger: 1978-1983, 2nd generation

By: SHOP ELECTRONICS!!!

SHOP ELECTRONICS!!! — Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:56:44 +0000

**YOUTUBE VIDEO REVIEWS ON THE HOTTEST ELECTRONICS OUT**…

#1 SITE FOR THE LATEST REVIEWS ON THE HOTTEST TECHNOLOGY HITTING THE MAINSTREAM!…

By: Japanese Kimonos

Japanese Kimonos — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:39:23 +0000

Awesome post! You have a great blog, absolutely the best Ive read so far. I will be looking forward to your next entry. Thanks again.

By: Frankie Devanski

Frankie Devanski — Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:42:11 +0000

Hello, great point. Posts like this post are why I follow your blog. Have a great 2010!

By: Ben T.

Ben T. — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:02:12 +0000

My apologies as well.

Thank you for replying.

By: Liquid

Liquid — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:26:20 +0000

Sorry, didn’t want to insult anyone, but the second generation is something seriously far way from the 1st one. Just my personal opinion

By: Ben T.

Ben T. — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:07:13 +0000

“ugly-looking disgracefully unpowerful muscleless car”
Seriously? Have you seen other late 70s or early 80s American Muscle cars? The basic design of all American Muscle cars during that era is basically the same (Trans Am, Mustang, Firebird, etc)–sharp lines and corners. If you say this looks ugly then ultimately your saying other cars with similar design are also ugly, and to think that majority of cars from 1979 to 1984 are the same in terms of styling. That was the “in” during that time Sir. So you must really hate that era, huh? So much for SUBJECTIVITY…
And “disgraceful”? Please! Is it really? Or is it just your ego talking… Are you insulted with the fact that an American Company known for making High Performance Cars would turn to the Japanese to try and save their company and the model that you are so into?
The Japanese even gave Dodge the bragging rights to tell everyone that they introduced the first “Silence Shafts” in the US.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m half American and half Asian. And I won’t have any of my heritage (both American and Japanese) be insulted by ignorance.
You are entitled to your opinion but making an obscure claim such as that is completely unnecessary and very ignorant.
Let’s face it, the car is not powerful compared to a V8, but with other normally aspirated inline 4s during its time, it was better.
Ultimately, I just want to express my view that although the car was indeed not a muscle car nor an exceptionally powerful car and indeed not as good as the old Challenger, it was, during the time (oil price soaring, economic crisis, etc.), generally a good car and was a good alternative.

By: Nadias Blog » Blog Archive » Quick Roundup

Nadias Blog » Blog Archive » Quick Roundup — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:56:27 +0000

[...] http://www.amcarguide.com/muscle-cars/dodge-challenger-1978-1983-2nd-generation/The Ford GT was all about competing Ferrari. At first, the aim was to win some races against Ferrari, but in the end Ford wanted all-american win in races [this means that all first 3 paces must be w. … [...]

By: Tiny Flourishes in Art » Blog Archive » ‘ford gt ‘ on the web

Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:39:29 +0000

[...] course on Cars « Mother, daughter found slain in Perris home‘ford gt ‘ on the webhttp://www.amcarguide.com/muscle-cars/dodge-challenger-1978-1983-2nd-generation/The Ford GT was all about competing Ferrari. At first, the aim was to win some races against [...]